American Friends of the Documentation Center of Austrian Resistance

Michal Shapira’s book Sigmund Freud and his Patient Margarethe Csonka (Routledge, 2023) received the 2024 Radomír Luža Prize, awarded by the Assosiation American Friends of the Documentation Center of Austrian Resistance and the German Studies Association.

Shapira examines one of Sigmund Freud’s least-studied cases, published in 1920 as “The Psychogenesis of a Case of Homosexuality in a Woman” and situates his study within the context of the history of psychoanalysis, science, and medicine as well as of gender, sexuality, and feminism in modern urban Central Europe. Freud’s unfinished four-month-long case study of seventeen year old Margarethe Csonka from an upper middle class Viennese family and her homosexual attraction to the ten years older Baroness Leonie von Puttkamer takes place during the emergence of the New Woman and progressive ideas about female sexuality while urban modernism remained connected to opposing ideals of womanhood. Freud did not treat “the girl” of his case study in a pejorative manner, nor did he diagnose the young woman’s homosexuality as neurotic and try to cure her. In fact, Shapira reasons compellingly, that societal changes for women as well as Viennese Jews influenced Freud’s mindset who had, when he began to analyze homosexuality at the turn of the century, followed a phallocentric attitude. Nevertheless, Shapira argues, while scholars of sexuality frequently focused on Freud’s writings on male homosexuality, disregarding his views on homosexual women, Freud was not as revolutionary as he claimed to be. By placing Freud’s ideas and analyzing and scrutinizing them closely in the context of the medical discourse, modernist social changes, and the prevailing antisemitism during the interwar years, Shapira reveals the uniqueness of Freud’s voice and demonstrates convincingly how he was more radical for his time than later feminists remember him. This book serves as a corrective, renewing and reinvigorating interest in Freud and demonstrates that his views on sexuality are as relevant today as ever.

Margarete Lamb-Faffelberger                                                                         
Lafayette College

The American Friends of the Documentation Center of Austrian Resistance are pleased to announce the annual Radomir Luza Prize for an outstanding work in the field of Austrian and/or Czechoslovak history in the 20th Century with a special focus on Austrian/Czechoslovak Studies in the World War II Era. This prize, initiated in 2012 by Center Austria: The Marshall Plan Center for European Studies at the University of New Orleans, has been bestowed since 2017 by the German Studies Association (GSA) and carries a cash award of $1000.00. It seeks seeks to encourage research in the history of Austria and Czechoslovakia focusing on the time period of the 1930s and 1940s, i.e. on the fields Professor Radomír Luža worked in.

To be eligible for the 2024 Radomir Luza Prize competition, the book or dissertation must have been published (or a dissertation defended) between January 1, 2023 and December 31, 2023.  Authors must be citizens or resident aliens (holders of “green cards”) of the United States or Canada. Dissertations must have been awarded by a North American University. The language of the work must be English.

To be considered for the Radomir Luza Prize competition, please send a copy of your work electronically to: winfried.garscha@doew.at

The deadline for submissions is August 15, 2024. The winner will be notified before September 5.

The awarding ceremony will take place at the Forty-Eighth Annual Conference of the German Studies Association to be held Sept. 26-29 2024, Atlanta, Georgia.

This prize, namend after the distinguished historian Radomír Luža, was initiated 2012 by by the American Friends of the Documentation Center of Austrian Resistance and Center Austria: the Austrian Marshall Plan Center for European Studies of the University of New Orleans. After a startup financing by the University of New Orleans, a subsidy given by the Austrian Future Funds secured the awarding of an annual prize of $1,000 for several years. Since 2020 this prize has been hosted by the German Studies Association.

The prize is named after Radomír Luža, who was professor for European and German history at Tulane University, New Orleans, for more than 25 years. He had published the first academic studies about Nazi persecution and resistance in Austria: “Austro-German Relations in the Anschluss Era” (1975) and “The resistance in Austria, 1938-1945” (1984).

The awarding ceremony is part of the annual conferences of the German Studies Association. It is one of the prizes awarded during the banquet of the organization which took place this year on 6 October at Le Centre Sheraton Montreal.

This year’s prize was awarded to Brett E. Sterling for his book “Hermann Broch and Mass Hysteria. Theory and Representation in the Age of Extremes”.

In his laudatory speech Andreas Kranebitter, director of the DÖW, quoted from the motivation of the Luza Prize Committee of the American Friends of the Documentation Center of Austrian Resistance:

‘Brett E. Sterling’s book is an innovative volume on the work of Austrian writer Hermann Broch (born 1886 in Vienna, died 1951 in New Haven, CT). His analysis convincingly contextualizes Broch’s forgotten manuscript not only within the author’s oeuvre as a whole, but also within the sociological literature on “the mass”. Noteworthy as well is the book’s scholarly accuracy. By including the writings of Gustave Le Bon, Theodor Geiger, Sigmund Freud, and others in his analysis, Sterling also exposes the scope and the limits of Broch’s innovativeness. He also attempts, albeit cautiously, to update Broch’s analyses for the Trump phenomenon. The work, also due to its stylistic brilliance, was unanimously rated as absolutely worthy of distinction by the reviewers and the Prize Committee.’

The American Friends of the Documentation Center of Austrian Resistance are pleased to announce the annual Radomir Luza Prize for an outstanding work in the field of Austrian and/or Czechoslovak history in the 20th Century with a special focus on Austrian/Czechoslovak Studies in the World War II Era. This prize, initiated in 2012 by Center Austria: The Marshall Plan Center for European Studies at the University of New Orleans, has been bestowed since 2017 by the German Studies Association (GSA) and carries a cash award of $1000.00. It seeks seeks to encourage research in the history of Austria and Czechoslovakia focusing on the time period of the 1930s and 1940s, i.e. on the fields Professor Radomír Luža worked in.

To be eligible for the 2023 Radomir Luza Prize competition, the book or dissertation must have been published (or a dissertation defended) between January 1, 2022 and December 31, 2022.  Authors must be citizens or resident aliens (holders of “green cards”) of the United States or Canada. Dissertations must have been awarded by a North American University. The language of the work must be English.

To be considered for the Radomir Luza Prize competition, please send a copy of your work electronically to: winfried.garscha@doew.at

The deadline for submissions is August 15, 2023.  The winner(s) will be notified before September 5.

The awarding ceremony will take place at the Forty-Seventh Annual Conference of the German Studies Association to be held from October 5 through 8, 2023, at Le Centre Sheraton Montreal Hotel in Montréal, Québec, Canada.

Elisabeth Boeckl-Klamper , Thomas Mang, and Wolfgang Neugebauer, The Vienna Gestapo 1938-1945: Crimes, Perpetrators, Victims. (Berghahn, New York and Oxford, 2022). $ 153,45.

Readers familiar with the Anschluss era in Austria, including the mass appeal of Hitler and National Socialism as well as the large number of Austrian officials involved in the expulsion and massacre of their Jewish fellow citizens, will be astonished, even shocked, by the revelations in this outstanding study. Based on exhaustive research in Germany, Israel, the United States, Slovenia the Russian Federation, and Austria itself, the authors demonstrate that with a staff of merely 900 officials and employees the Vienna Gestapo controlled not only most of the “Ostmark,” but also became  the largest Gestapo headquarters in Greater Germany. Furthermore, many of its officials distinguished themselves as commanders of SS Einsatzgruppen and even Nazi extermination centers.

            The book is divided into fourteen chapters, but in fact constitutes three main parts: the first discusses the establishment, organization, personnel, and routine business undertaken at Gestapo headquarters, the second the brutal persecution of the Jews and résistance groups, the third post war prosecutions of Gestapo officials by the judiciary of the Second Austrian Republic.

            The authors begin by explaining that even before the Anschluss refugee Austrian Nazis in the Altreich, most notably, Rudolf Mildner and Adolf Eichmann had drawn up extensive plans for the establishment of a Gestapo branch in Vienna that would control of much of Lower Austria as well. And because most of the police force, such as the chief, Otto Steinhäusl, were themselves Nazis or sympathetic to Hitler’s movement it took only a few days for the Vienna Gestapo to begin operations. On 26 March, for example, the Gestapo seized the capacious Metropole Hotel as headquarters. Simultaneously, agents began rounding up Jews and leaders of the hated Christian Corporative regime to be dispatched to Dachau. Here and throughout the book the writers stress that with sole exception of Franz Huber, a Bavarian Gestapo official working closely with Reinhard Heydrich, leading members of the Vienna Gestapo were highly educated Austrians committed to Nazi ideology. Section heads tended to be lower middle class in background, though a number possessed much needed technical skills, others seeking job security. Between seventeen and thirty percent of the staff were women, employed as clerical workers and typists. None committed atrocities, but as the authors stress, they supported the regime and were fully aware of Gestapo crimes, including the deportation and extermination of the Jews, even in Auschwitz. Postwar claims to the contrary, only ten percent of the Vienna Gestapo were Reich Germans; rotating on a regular basis they served only a brief spell in the Metropole Hotel.

            Unlike the East German Stasi or the Soviet KGB, the authors demonstrate that the Vienna Gestapo was not a large organization capable of monitoring the entire population in those areas it controlled. Instead, the Gestapo relied on informants and denouncers. The authors also take partial issue with Robert Gellately’s contention that the Nazi state was a “self-policing society.” Whether this was the case remains an open question. However, there can be no doubt that Hitler’s regime was both popular and enjoyed the support of an overwhelming majority of the Austrian people. To be sure, few were aware of the brutalities of Gestapo imposed on their victims, but historical scholarship has revealed that hundreds of Viennese onlookers cheered as they witnessed trucks carrying Jews to collection centers to be deported to concentration camps or extermination centers in the East.

            In the second part of this study (chapters 9-17), the authors discuss the savage torture and persecution of the Jews and other resistance groups. The cruel, vindictive, and murderous persecution of Austrian Jewry has been described and analyzed for decades, particularly by historians of the Holocaust. Under the auspices of Gestapo office II B 4 Viennese Jews were robbed of their assets, forced to emigrate, ghettoized, and in 1941-42 driven to collection points where they were dispatched to extermination centers. As mentioned earlier, there is little new in these pages, although the authors provide exact amounts of Jewish assets seized by the regime, for example as early as 28 June 1938 the Nazis seized, RM 3,903,391, often keeping some of the belongings for themselves. And after Kristallnacht in November, the Vienna Gestapo shipped RM 1,000,000 in jewelry to Berlin, Finally, the authors calculate that Schirach, Ebner, and Huber were responsible for the murder of 48,000 individuals in the Holocaust.

            In discussing the persecution of the Roman Catholic Church the authors remind readers that the Nazis confronted a dilemma. On the one hand, the regime did not wish to alienate the overwhelmingly Catholic population, not least because the Anschluss had been welcomed by Cardinal Theodor Innitzer. On the other hand, the Gestapo sought both to seize clerical property and challenge the Christian religion itself. Unsurprisingly, it was Gestapo Deputy Chief Karl Ebner, who orchestrated the assault. While formally leaving the Church in 1938, he retained many friends among the higher clergy, who helped him pick and choose what was to be secularized or expropriated. These measures included the imposition of a church tax, seizing the nearby abbey of Klosterneuburg, confiscating various pamphlets, and monitoring the homilies of parish priests and curates. At the same time, the Gestapo proceeded brutally against organized Catholic Conservative resistance groups, most notably those led by Karl Roman Scholz, Jakob Kastelic, and Karl Lederer. To this list may be added Sister Maria Restituta. All of whom, as well as many of their followers, were savagely beaten and sent to the guillotine. The Vienna Gestapo also persecuted and murdered members of smaller Catholic Conservative factions, though not as viciously as they did Communist groups.

            That the Vienna Gestapo proceeded mercilessly against Communist resistance cells is both well known and documented, particularly during the period following Hitler’s invasion of the Soviet Union. All but a handful of KP members apprehended by the Gestapo were tortured to death or executed. In March, 1944, for example, a third of all arrests, including those taken into custody for pretty crimes, were Communists. Nearly all of these had been betrayed by paid informants. The stool-pigeons, in turn, broadcast false information that enabled the Gestapo to track down and capture Soviet parachutists. In dealing with Revolutionary Socialists the Vienna Gestapo pursued policies of ambiguity. On the one hand, those of Jewish origin, such as Käthe Leichter, were dispatched to concentration camps or extermination centers, On the other, a number who had participated in the February 1934 uprising tended to be well treated, in some cases hired as municipal workers or employees. The authors provide details on the maltreatment of Socialist resisters, as well as those who had fought against Franco in the Spanish Civil War, but for the most part concede that given their relatively small numbers they managed to avoid Gestapo detection and arrest.

            Those pages devoted to the suppression of non-organized resistance are exceptionally revealing. The authors note that defeatist statements, malicious gossip, anti-Hitler jokes, and listening to foreign radio broadcasts were not uncommon. Some, such as simple wisecracks, were not even hostile to the Nazi regime. As might be expected, those accused of what were minor misdemeanors were conveyed by anonymous letters, many of which revealed knowledge of the Holocaust. The Gestapo responded by taking drastic measures against the accused. Of those arrested for “radio crimes,” for example, nearly all were imprisoned and over half condemned to death. The objective here was to intimidate the population, by demonstrating that even minor crimes would not go unpunished. Much worse was the fate of those apprehended for helping or hiding Jews in the eyes of the regime a capital offense. No fewer than 1,532 “Jewish Helpers” were captured and subsequently murdered. The fact that only 110 Austrians have been honored as members of the “righteous among nations” at Yad Vashem, the authors lugubriously conclude, proves once again the ubiquitous anti-Semitic sentiment that prevailed in the ”Ostmark” during the Anschluss era.

            Interestingly, the Vienna Gestapo was only marginally involved in the persecution of homosexuals as was the case elsewhere in Hitler’s domain. However, their agents did establish an “Arbeitserziehungslager” in Oberlanzendorf, apparently the only one in annexed Austria. Regulations stipulated that incarcerated youngsters should have taught proper work habits, but Gestapo men preferred shackling, beatings, and short rations, so that many boys died of disease and physical abuse. At this point the authors modulate to describe the activities of those Viennese Gestapo officials posted on “external deployment,” that is, the mass murder of hostages, partisans, POWs, Jews and other undesirables throughout Nazi occupied Europe. Among the most prominent were Heinrich Berger, who orchestrated the Lidice and Lezaky massacres in 1942 and Karl Macher, who committed numerous crimes in Greece. The authors provide the names of other Individuals, including agents operating in France against refugee Austrian Communists. In 1948 an Austrian Volksgericht sentenced Berger to eleven years in prison, but the authors point out that he served only two years behind bars; in contrast, Macher was less fortunate in that he was re-arrested in 1970 and sentenced to thirty months in prison. As for those Gestapo officials most responsible for the spasm of 1945 massacres that occurred in Vienna and Lower Austria – Mildner, Huber, and Ebner – all three escaped retribution or punishment. On the other hand, the authors remind us that some of the mass murders that took place in April, 1945 were often spontaneous and in a number of cases undertaken by civilians seeking revenge for the Allied bombing raids.

In the final third of their study the authors address the prosecution of Vienna Gestapo officials by the postwar Austrian government. This was no easy task as most Gestapo records had been burned or destroyed. Even so, by the end of May 1945, somewhere between 2,000 to 5,500 Nazis had been taken into custody. A few months later the Renner government established Volksgerichte (people’s courts) to try Nazi war criminals. It is remarkable that in the following decade 136,829 individuals were arraigned, 28,148 indicted, and 13,607 convicted, including 43 who were sentenced to death. Aside from major figures such as Seyß-Inquart, Kaltenbrunner, Schirach and five others who were tried in Nuremburg, died, or disappeared, the Volksgericht managed to identify and try many important officials of the Vienna Gestapo, the most important of whom, the authors contend, were Karl Ebner, Othmar Trenker, Karl Silberbauer, Anton Brödl and Johann Sanitzer.

            Exactly why the authors chose to discuss the cases of these seven perpetrators is not altogether clear, but the selection can be regarded as paradigmatic. Franz Huber, for example, had been interned in Nuremberg-Langwasser after the war. In April, 1948 camp authorities requested that his file be forwarded to them for examination. The Vienna police responded with only exiguous information. As a consequence, a German Spruchkammer classified him as a “lesser offender,” sentencing him to one year’s probation and the payment of a small fine. Two years later, he was retried but judged to be a “particularly hardworking police officer.” Soon thereafter the CIA recruited Huber as source of information about the Soviet Union and shortly after permitted him to join Reinhard Gehlen’s Bundesnachrichtendienst. In short, the man who had headed the largest regional Gestapo headquarters in Hitler’s realm received little more than a slap on the hand, retiring in 1967 with a sizeable pension.

            Karl Ebner, Deputy Chief of the Vienna Gestapo responsible for the deportation of Jews to the East, also received relatively lenient treatment. British authorities remanded him to the Austrian judiciary in 1947 to be tried the following year. Prosecutors presented irrefutable evidence of Ebner’s major role in the looting and deportation of the Jews, for which he was sentenced to 20 years in prison. However, the court also took into account the testimony of twenty-three higher clergymen, prelates, and officials of the Catholic Cartellverband whom Ebner had protected as “reinsurance.” All but four maintained that the defendant has saved the lives of many people, thus saving him from what should have been a death sentence. In 1953 Ebner was pardoned and in 1960 his academic title restored.

            Othmar Trenker’s career trajectory and postwar fate resembled that of Ebner. Known for his brutal treatment of Gestapo victims, Trenker was tried by the Volksgericht in December, 1948. Like other high ranking Gestapo officials, he denied the indictment by relying on a technicality to contend that he had not been Department Head as charged. Further, the authors reveal, the state prosecutor behaved more as a defense counsel than a prosecuting attorney. The court thus sentenced him to eighteen months in prison for “illegality” (because of his clandestine membership in the Nazi party before the Anschluss), but released him for time already served in an American compound in Salzburg. The verdict aroused such outrage that in October, 1949 Trenker was tried again, found guilty of “enhanced interrogation,” and sentenced to five years behind bars. A few months later, however, he was released on probation and in 1957 awarded a civil service position.

            Karl Silberbauer was arrested and tried, in part for his role as a Gestapo official in the Netherlands. In Amsterdam SS-Hauptscharführer Silberbauer had participated in the arrest of Anne Frank. But this was unknown to the Austrian prosecutors. The tribunal realized that Silberbauer was not a major war criminal and sentenced him to one year in prison. In 1952 Silberbauer applied for the case to be reopened. In 1954 he was tried and acquitted, but not permitted to continue his career as a Vienna police officer. In 1963 Simon Wiesenthal revealed that Silberbauer had been in charge of the house search in August 1944. Silberbauer was arrested again, but soon released with reference to his previous trial.

            Anton Brödl had been one of the most brutal, violent thugs in the Vienna Gestapo. In 1947 he surrendered to the authorities, pleading guilty to crimes against humanity. But he was never brought to trial, as physicians and psychiatrists recommended that be sent Steinhof psychiatric hospital to determine whether he was mentally sane. The physicians drew different conclusions, but in 1955 agreed that Brödl was not only delusionary paranoid but also a danger to society. Whether Brödl was mentally unbalanced, the authors agree, will never be known. But like other Vienna Gestapo officials, he escaped punishment.

            The trial and punishment of Johann Sanitzer, one of the main officials of the Vienna Gestapo, differed somewhat from that of others brought before the bench for extreme brutality, illegality, and “enhanced interrogation.” Because had studied German history and philosophy, Sanitzer came close to outwitting the prosecution, cleverly pleading guilty to some crimes while denying others. In addition, he had pursued a policy of “reinsurance” so that even Karl Seitz, Lord Mayor of Vienna testified on his behalf. Nevertheless, in 1949 the court sentenced Sanitzer to life in prison. Two months later, Soviet occupying officers removed him from Stein penitentiary and took him to Moscow where he was no doubt tortured, beaten, and brutally treated. Not until the signing of the State Treaty in 1955 was he repatriated to Austria, where he was eventually pardoned. In a sense, Sanitzer was a major Gestapo official who did manage to escape severe punishment and retribution, albeit not at the hands of his own countrymen.

            What is one to make of this remarkable book? The authors themselves provide an answer, writing that “the Vienna Gestapo was the most important instrument of terror in Austria.” (p. 358). With a staff of merely 900 individuals it exercised authority over 3.6 million people, controlling parts of Slovakia, Hungary, Yugoslavia, Italy, and even border areas of Switzerland. In short, the power of the Vienna Gestapo has been underestimated. While much the information in the book is repetitious relying, for example, on numerous accounts of Austrian resistance movements, it does provide a great many previously unknown details. In addition, it reveals the significant role of informants in apprehending and persecuting opponents, both real and imagined. Arguably, the most revealing and disturbing section of the study focuses on the prosecution of Gestapo officiboals by the judiciary of the Second Austrian Republic. For a great many reasons, including the lack of hard evidence, the authors admit that the judgments were far too lenient. To this may added that those indicted and tried, literally got away with murder.

Evan Burr Bukey

Andreas Kranebitter assumes directorship of the DÖW on April 1,2023

The Board of Trustees (“Stiftungsrat”) of the Documentation Center of Austrian Resistance has named Dr. Andreas Kranebitter as the new Director of the DÖW.

Kranebitter, currently working in research in the United States, was chosen from among eighteen applicants. He assumes directorship in April 2023.

The change in leadership was prompted by the retirement of Gerhard Baumgartner, who successfully led the institution since 2014, and will now dedicate himself to his further studies in the history of the Roma in Austria.

Federal Minister for Education, Science, and Research Martin Polaschek: “The DÖW is a highly respected research institution on resistance, persecution, the Holocaust, Nazi- and postwar justice, as well as right wing extremism after 1945. It thus has central significance for Austrian society and research. I am delighted that with Andreas Kranebitter, a demonstrated expert is taking over the leadership of the DÖW, and I wish him good luck in the forthcoming challenges. At the same time, I would like to sincerely thank Gerhard Baumgartner for his professional work as director of the DÖW.”

Photo: Joel Mason-Gaines, United States Holocaust Memorial Museum

Dr. Kranebitter, born in 1982 in Vienna, studied sociology and political science. His theses were awarded the Herbert Steiner and the Irma Rosenberg prizes. He began his career in the Mauthausen concentration camp Memorial , where he rose to the directorship of research, and became responsible for essential parts of its new exhibit. Most recently he was director of the archive of the history of sociology at the University of Graz. In the past, Kranebitter and the DÖW worked often together on mutual projects.

Vienna Mayor Michael Ludwig congratulated Andreas Kranebitter on his hiring: “With him, leadership is being transferred to a profound scientist with extensive experience in the long-standing debate regarding Austrian history, because sixty years after its founding, the DÖW is taking on a central role in the fight against right wing extremism, neofascism, and racism. The fact-based reappraisal of our history is essential to faithfully comply with the principle, ‘Study, Preserve, and Pass on to the next generation’. That has been a commitment to which the DÖW has subscribed, and which has been tirelessly furthered in past years under the leadership of Gerhard Baumgartner. I would like to express my great thanks to him for that.”

The Board of Trustees of the DÖW is convinced that Dr. Kranebitter on the one hand, will in loyal fashion continue the work of the DÖW, but on the other hand will set new momentum.

In a first statement Kranebitter expressed his pleasure: “The DÖW is a unique institution in Austria that combines the historical analysis of Nazism, with sociological research and documentation of current far right extremism and antisemitism. I am delighted to assume the leadership of this tradition-rich institution, and will dedicate myself to this task with great strength and long breath.”

Since 2020 this prize, namend after the distinguished historian Radomír Luža, has been hosted by the German Studies Association. The prize is being awarded by the American Friends of the Documentation Center of Austrian Resistance and Center Austria: the Austrian Marshall Plan Center for European Studies of the University of New Orleans. Luža, who was professor for European and German history at Tulane University, New Orleans, for more than 25 years. He published the first academic studies about Nazi persecution and resistance in Austria: “Austro-German Relations in the Anschluss Era” (1975) and “The resistance in Austria, 1938-1945” (1984).

The awarding ceremony is part of the annual conferences of the German Studies Association. This year’s prizes were awarded to Zachary Doleshal, Sam Houston State University (Huntsville, Tx), and Chad Bryant, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.

The laudations can be read on the GSA website.

The Documentation Center of Austrian Resistance seeks a Scientific Director beginning 1/1/2023.

The Documentation Center of Austrian Resistance (hereafter DÖW), supported by the Republic of Austria and the City of Vienna, was established in 1963 by former resistance fighters as well as by dedicated scholars, and has been an official Foundation since 1983. The central topics of interest include research and communication regarding resistance and persecution in Austria from 1933 to 1938, and from 1938 through 1945; the Holocaust; Roma and Sinti; exile; Nazi medical crimes; Nazi and postwar justice; right wing extremism and antisemitism after 1945; and restitution and compensation after 1945.

In addition, the work of the DÖW includes gathering thematically relevant sources; scientifically organizing; and archiving them. The DÖW maintains an archive and library comprising extensive collections and data sets, used in consultative services to students and researchers; journalists; and other interested parties. The DÖW dedicates itself to the communication of contemporary material to young students in particular, but also to adult education. The latter is supported by a permanent exhibit space and two memorials.

Job Description

The scientific manager/director is responsible for the strategic vision of the DÖW, leading its managers and staff, including budgeting in accordance with Article 10 of the founding charter of the DÖW. Likewise, the director is responsible for the DÖW’s research projects; conceiving of proposals; and the acquisition of third-party funds for research and development projects on a domestic, European, and transnational basis.

These activities proceed in close collaboration with the Foundation Committee (Stiftungsrat), its Foundation Chair, and the Association Chair of the DÖW (Vereinsvorstand). There is also collaboration with victims’ and concentration camp organizations, as well as research institutes and societies domestically and abroad. The scientific manager/director represents the DÖW in the domestic and international scientific community, in various advisory groups and before the public and the media.

Position Qualifications

• Experience in leading a scientific or academic institution. Managerial talent and experience (business leadership, financial planning, account maintenance, supervision of personnel; and internal and external representation). [Weighting: 30%]
• Knowledge of Austrian educational and research structures, experience in political relations and administration. [Weighting: 10%]
• Leadership qualities, teamwork, social competence, well developed communications skills, and experience in media relations. [Weighting: 10%]
• Internationally recognized archival, documentary, reporting and research activity in the area of contemporary history; and specifically contemporary Austrian history including: resistance against the Nazi regime; Nazi persecution for racist and/or political reasons (in particular, of Jews, national and religious minorities, and Roma and Sinti); Nazi crimes; the Nazi movement in Austria; right wing extremism; research in antisemitism and genocide; denazification and reparations; social measures for Nazi victims after 1945. [Weighting: 30%]
• Knowledge and experience in conceiving, innovating, and implementing documentary and communications projects. Knowledge and experience in completing research projects, as well as dissemination of their findings. [Weighting: 20%]

Formal Criteria

Completion of a doctoral/PhD program, preferably in history, cultural science, or social science. Mastery in reading and writing English and German at a discourse level. Additional language skills would be desirable.

Hiring is on a full time basis. Service begins January 1, 2023. Remuneration follows the Collective Agreement (Kollektivvertrag) of the Employees of the Universities of October 1, 2009 in the pertinent version (paragraph 49. Salary system for scientific and artistic university personnel, Salary Group A1); the minimum monthly gross pay is 5,321.70 Euros.

Please submit your application with CV and list of publications, as well as other documents worthy of consideration by email no later than August 19, 2022 to the Chair of the Foundation Council (Stiftungsrat), Dr. Michael Häupl, at bewerbungen2022@doew.at.

Equal Treatment Provision (Gleichbehandlungsklausel): In order to increase the proportion of women, women are emphatically encouraged to apply. According to Paragraph 11b and Paragraph 11c of the federal Equal Treatment Law (Gleichbehandlungsgesetz) women applicants who match with the best qualified male applicant, are favored for the position.

All applicants will receive confirmation of submission of their application within seven working days.

The American Friends of the Documentation Center of Austrian Resistance/Vienna, supported by Center Austria: The Marshall Plan Center for European Studies at the University of New Orleans, are pleased to announce the annual Radomir Luza Prize for an outstanding work in the field of Austrian and/or Czechoslovak History in the 20th Century.  This prize carries a cash award of $1000.00 and seeks to encourage research in the abovementioned fields focusing on the fields Professor Radomír Luža worked in.

To be eligible for the 2021 Radomir Luza Prize competition, the book or dissertation must have been published (or a dissertation defended) between January 1, 2021 and December 31, 2021.  Authors must be citizens or resident aliens (holders of “green cards”) of the United States or Canada.  Dissertations must have been awarded by a North American University.  The language of the work must be English.

To be considered for the Radomir Luza Prize competition, please send a copy of your work electronically to: winfried.garscha@doew.at

The deadline for submissions has been extended to August 30, 2022. 

The winner will be announced at the GSA convention to be held in Houston, Tx, from September 15 until 18 2022 at the Hilton Americas Hotel in Houston, Texas.

The American Friends of the Documentation Center of Austrian Resistance/Vienna, supported by Center Austria: The Marshall Plan Center for European Studies at the University of New Orleans, are pleased to announce the Ninth annual Radomir Luza Prize for an outstanding work in the field of Austrian and/or Czechoslovak History in the 20th Century.  This prize carries a cash award of $1000.00 and seeks to encourage research in the abovementioned fields focusing on the fields Professor Radomír Luža worked in.

To be eligible for the 2021 Radomir Luza Prize competition, the book or dissertation must have been published (or a dissertation defended) between January 1, 2020 and December 31, 2020.  Authors must be citizens or resident aliens (holders of “green cards”) of the United States or Canada.  Dissertations must have been awarded by a North American University.  The language of the work must be English.

To be considered for the Radomir Luza Prize competition, please send a copy of your work electronically to:  gjbischo@uno.edu and winfried.garscha@doew.at

The deadline for submissions is August 15, 2021. 

The winner will be announced at the GSA convention to be held in Indianapolis from 30 September to 3 October 2021 at the Indianapolis Marriott Downtown in Indianapolis, Indiana.